Perfect scores in board assessments boost concerns at the satisfactory of questions asked and if it’s miles selling rote gaining knowledge of
The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) and Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations (CISCE) currently announced elegance X and XII board consequences that witnessed students scoring cent per cent marks or dropping surely one mark. This 12 months also saw a extraordinary upward thrust of top scorers from the Humanities move.
Sanyam Bhardwaj, controller of examinations, CBSE, says, “Most frequently, academically shiny college students who score excessive in magnificence X who take technology movement start making ready for aggressive tests soon after. The exercise of making use of shortcuts to get answers, hamper their elegance XII board consequences as CBSE follows a sturdy step-clever marking scheme. On the opposite hand, Humanities college students systematically follow the sample advised through CBSE.”


Are we nurturing a technology of crammers 1
Krishna Kumar, former director, National Council for Educational Research and Training (NCERT) blames it on poorly drafted query papers within the board checks.
“The hassle with perfect scores is without delay associated with the poor first-rate questions, which may be replied by means of rote getting to know. Besides, the solutions used for evaluation have a stereotyped model and the precise answer is the one that follows this version. Slightly original and creative answers do no longer get marks,” says Kumar.
The board outcomes are an immediate mirrored image of a persevered subculture of cramming in an effort to finally weaken the higher training.

“Most better education institutes across India admit students on the basis of class XII marks. In many instances, students who need to observe a sure difficulty do no longer get sufficient marks to get admission. It implies that the system does not allow a fair distribution of opportunities consistent with people’s pastimes and these are a number of the huge scale distortions that an unsteady exam gadget introduces,” provides Kumar. The academician disagrees with the common notion of Science topics being extra scoring and Humanities circulation leaving a huge room for subjectivity. “One can not classify a subject as more or much less scoring. It all depends on how we grasp the ideas and how creatively we practice the ones principles for strange issues,” says Kumar.
If questions are focussed on solving a practical problem, then the exams will assist in differentiating between creative and mechanical minds. “Our questions are flat and does now not permit college students to apply crucial wondering, for this reason, we end up with utterly accurate answers,” says Kumar. Evaluation, he adds, is but any other motive that has crushed the very reason of examinations. “Evaluation is treated as a trivial and low-paying task. An evaluator is predicted to check round one hundred scripts in an afternoon and gets a median of 15 mins at the side of Rs 30-50 per solution sheet. One can only meet this target through completing the mission robotically leaving no hazard for deep evaluation of solutions,” he adds.